Decision 65265
Full Text of Decision 65265
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| claim procedure |
requests for information |
|
|
Summary:
The claimant had refused to provide information during an interview with a Commission officer. The umpire concluded that the claimant therefore did not meet one of the eligibility conditions required under subsection 49(1) of the Act.
Decision 29279
Full Text of Decision 29279
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| claim procedure |
requests for information |
|
|
Summary:
Claim filed in 1-93. Last day worked reported as 6-7-92. Refusal to clarify his activities in the meantime based on his human rights. To refuse to divulge pertinent information to assist the Commission in determining whether the claim is justified, is clearly a breach of the terms of the UI Act.
Decision 21031
Full Text of Decision 21031
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| claim procedure |
requests for information |
|
|
Summary:
We have a case wherein the Commission's officer has some doubt about the legitimacy of the claim and seeks more information, as he is entitled to do. When that information is not forwarded to the Commission, ss.41(1) directs that claimant be disentitled.
Decision 20075
Full Text of Decision 20075
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| claim procedure |
requests for information |
|
|
Summary:
The claimant came for an interview but refused to complete a questionnaire. He persisted in his refusal for about a month and was disentitled for the duration of his refusal. Ss.39(2) provides for this. The questionnaire contained questions patently relevant to his entitlement.
Decision 12767
Full Text of Decision 12767
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| claim procedure |
requests for information |
|
|
Summary:
Claim on 27-9; disentitled for leaving voluntarily; he was asked for an explanation of this on 11-10; declared disentitled because of delay in responding. Disentitlement should not commence before 11-10; terminated on Tuesday, 13-11.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| basic concepts |
disqualification and disentitlement |
|
|
| voluntarily leaving employment |
working conditions |
unsatisfactory |
|
| voluntarily leaving employment |
new employment |
delay between two jobs |
|
Decision 10089
Full Text of Decision 10089
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| claim procedure |
requests for information |
|
|
Summary:
Absence on a camping trip cannot be used to justify delay in receiving the Commission's request. In circumstances such as this, disentitlement should take effect from a deemed delivery date.
Disentitled from 28-6 due to failure to answer availability questionnaire dated 15-7. The Board misapplied the law. One can hardly be said not to have complied with a request for information until she has received notice of that request. Not to be disentitled prior to 16-7.
