Decision 39226
Full Text of Decision 39226
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| labour dispute |
regularly engaged |
elsewhere |
|
Summary:
Loss of employment due to a labour dispute. Found new insurable employment elsewhere. Umpire determined that “regularly” does not refer to the duration of the employment but rather to its continuity, the employment in question being continuous in the sense that it lasted until termination. The claimant was required to perform the same work according to the same schedule, and was subject to the same circumstances, temperature and other factors as the other employees involving in doing the same kind of work. Umpire therefore found that paragraph 31(1)(b) of the Act applied because he had no doubt that “this new employment” was real, serious and authentic.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| labour dispute |
regularly engaged |
definition |
|
Decision 14253
Full Text of Decision 14253
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| labour dispute |
regularly engaged |
elsewhere |
|
Summary:
Stopped working due to the strike. Returned to work during strike some 3 months and crossed picket line and then laid off. Not employed "elsewhere" under 44(1)(b) since he returned at same premises for same employer.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| labour dispute |
loss of employment |
by reason of a stoppage |
|
