Decision A-0352.95
Full Text of Decision A-0352.95
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| labour dispute |
loss of employment |
training period |
|
Summary:
NOTE: This case is virtually identical to that of Michelle Bouillon (A-351-95). See indexed summary.
Decision A-0351.95
Full Text of Decision A-0351.95
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| labour dispute |
loss of employment |
training period |
|
Summary:
Stoppage of work after four weeks of a training period of eight weeks. The claimant was paid by the employer during the training period. The FCA ruled that the claimant was bound by a service contract and was part of the employee group, like all the other employees. His salary was determined by the collective agreement, he paid union dues, and salary issues were central to the concerns of the strikers. Furthermore, the precarious and irregular nature of an employment cannot affect the very existence of the employment.
Decision 23625A
Full Text of Decision 23625A
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| labour dispute |
loss of employment |
training period |
|
Summary:
Stoppage of work at Télébec after 4 weeks of an 8 week training period. Claimant paid by Télébec during training. Held that she was on a probationary period prior to obtaining a regular job which had not been promised her and that according to GIONEST, she cannot lose a job that she does not have.
