Decision 18216
Full Text of Decision 18216
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
labour dispute |
loss of employment |
hired due to stoppage |
|
Summary:
Called back to work on 18-1; lock-out on 20-1. The Board considered that the employer did not act in good faith. No evidence in this regard. An error in law to say that the employer must show good faith within the meaning of Reg. 49.
other summary
Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
board of referees |
errors in law |
misinterpretation of provision |
|
Decision 15967
Full Text of Decision 15967
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
labour dispute |
loss of employment |
hired due to stoppage |
|
Summary:
CUB 10481 examined and distinguished in 4 respects. In CUB 10481, common knowledge that strike pending at time of hiring, hired as permanent and laid off upon resumption of work, hired for a task he had never before performed, employment obtained as stop-gap measure.
other summary
Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
labour dispute |
loss of employment |
while claiming ui |
|
labour dispute |
directly interested |
own conditions at issue |
|
Decision 14490A
Full Text of Decision 14490A
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
labour dispute |
loss of employment |
hired due to stoppage |
|
Summary:
Several questions remained unanswered and are necessary in deciding whether the insured was hired because of the work stoppage that was to take place shortly.
Decision 11475
Full Text of Decision 11475
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
labour dispute |
loss of employment |
hired due to stoppage |
|
Summary:
The appropriate finding here is twofold. First, the impending strike on 2-1 was the reason that this claimant was able to obtain secondary employment on 20-11 and ought not, therefore, to be considered as the cause of losing it.
The Board rejected claimant's argument because he could not prove he had been hired in an attempt by employer to stockpile material in anticipation of strike. The Board erred in placing such onerous burden on him. Its responsibility is to consider all evidence and make a finding.
other summary
Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
labour dispute |
rationale |
|
|
labour dispute |
loss of employment |
terminates during strike |
|
labour dispute |
loss of employment |
while claiming ui |
|
Decision 11300
Full Text of Decision 11300
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
labour dispute |
loss of employment |
hired due to stoppage |
|
Summary:
If he had been hired solely to increase production before strike and afterward laid off against his will, I could have concluded as in CUB-8985 and 10481 that he was still entitled.
other summary
Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
labour dispute |
loss of employment |
while claiming ui |
|