Summary of Issue: Dual Employment

Decision 15879 Full Text of Decision 15879

Claimant laid off from full-time job but continued with part-time job while collecting UI. Many months later, he loses his part-time job due to a stoppage of work. BOLDT and SCHOEN referred to.

Decision 14704 Full Text of Decision 14704

Holds down 2 jobs: laid off full-time 8-12, work stoppage 21-12 at the part-time employer. Files claim 8-12, ineligible as of 21-12. The loss of a second job does not change acquired entitlement. [p. 5]

Decision 12987 Full Text of Decision 12987

Laid off full-time but continues part-time elsewhere while on UI. Then locked out; directly interested. Properly disentitled from any benefit. SCHOEN referred to. Inclined to allow as in CUBs 10481, 11475 and 12753 but here not token employment and bound by BOLDT.

Decision A-1514.83 Full Text of Decision A-1514.83

Lost his main employment due to the strike 15-9-78 but his part-time job continued until lack of work 30-12-78 and was no sham. Both were insurable. Employment defined in 2(1)(g). He had 2 employments. The loss of one is not the loss of "his". He continued to be employed.

Decision A-0090.81 Full Text of Decision A-0090.81

As to the suggestions that 44(1) be read so as not to apply to persons having more than one employment and to persons working part-time, I fail to see why the normal meaning of the words used should be thus restricted. Benefits not payable in respect of various employments one may have held in the past. When UI is paid to a claimant who held, either concurrently or successively, many different jobs, the Act does not provide for the division and allotment of the benefit between the various jobs.