Decision A-0657.79
Full Text of Decision A-0657.79
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| labour dispute |
directly interested |
contracting out |
|
Summary:
According to Umpire, insured was only indirectly interested, as he was employed by a subcontractor, even though subcontracting was one of the points in issue. Umpire erred in law, since the insured's situation was the same as in PELLETIER.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| labour dispute |
stoppage of work |
premises |
|
Decision A-0305.79
Full Text of Decision A-0305.79
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| labour dispute |
directly interested |
contracting out |
|
Summary:
Case identical to CUB-5363 with which Umpire stated he agreed: since subcontracting was the main point in issue, the insured was directly interested. We are of the opinion that the Umpire did not err in law.
