Decision A-0599.92
Full Text of Decision A-0599.92
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
earnings |
income |
non-competitive clause |
|
Summary:
The fact that the Agreement contains a non-competitive clause does not preclude the periodic payments from being classified as pension income, if that is their "true nature". The Board was correct in characterizing the non-competitive allowance as a pension. Upheld by the FC.
other summary
Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
earnings |
severance pay |
definition |
|
board of referees |
errors in law |
meaning of a term |
|
earnings |
income |
nature of monies |
|
earnings |
pension |
definition |
|
Decision 20965
Full Text of Decision 20965
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
earnings |
income |
non-competitive clause |
|
Summary:
Refer to: A-0599.92
other summary
Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
earnings |
income |
nature of monies |
|
board of referees |
errors in law |
meaning of a term |
|
earnings |
severance pay |
definition |
|
earnings |
pension |
definition |
|
Decision 13535
Full Text of Decision 13535
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
earnings |
income |
non-competitive clause |
|
Summary:
The portion of the payment allocable to the non competition covenant is not income. The portion allocable as damages in respect of the threatened action for wrongful dismissal is income. What must be determined is what portion should be allocated to each covenant. [p. 5]