| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| earnings |
income |
paid into rrsp |
|
Summary:
Labour Adjustment Benefits. Neither the Board nor the Umpire had jurisdiction to grant the relief sought (compensation for misinformation received from CEIC to the effect that pension monies paid into an RRSP were not earnings).
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
jurisdiction |
priority of law |
|
Summary:
According to claimant, the Umpire erred because, to avoid causing injury to claimant, he should have refused to apply the Act. A judge is bound by the Act. He cannot refuse to apply it, even on grounds of equity, said the FC. Upheld by SC.
