Decision A0603.06
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision A0603.06 | Cundle | Pelletier, J.A.. | English | 2007-11-05 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed Unanimous | No | Claimant | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| board of referees | weight of statements | documentary evidence |
Summary:
The BOR was entitled to make findings of fact on the basis of all the evidence and in doing so, it obviously discounted the documentary evidence submitted by the applicant in favour of his earlier statements to the Commission.