| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| teaching |
non-teaching period |
defined |
|
Summary:
The claimant worked as a teacher during the 2010-2011 school year and she accepted a job offer to teach for the 2011-2012 school year. She applied for EI benefits effective July 3, 2011 for the summer break. The Commission determined that the claimant was not eligible for benefits during the summer school break because she was employed in teaching. The FCA concluded that the claimant was a teacher. However, the FCA held taht section 33 of the EIR did not apply because the claimant was not teaching in an institution specifically listed in section 33 of the Regulations, but rather in a training centre for adults.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| teaching |
teaching defined |
training for adults |
|
Summary:
The claimant worked as a teacher during the 2010-2011 school year and she accepted a job offer to teach for the 2011-2012 school year. She applied for EI benefits effective July 3, 2011 for the summer break. The Commission determined that the claimant was not eligible for benefits during the summer school break because she was employed in teaching. The FCA concluded that the claimant was a teacher. However, the FCA held taht section 33 of the EIR did not apply because the claimant was not teaching in an institution specifically listed in section 33 of the Regulations, but rather in a training centre for adults.
