| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
errors in law |
|
|
Summary:
The Court was of the opinion that the BOR ignored the documented proof on file tending to demonstrate that the claimant operated a business and did not look for work during the period in question. The Court considered that the Board could have for valid reasons dismissed these facts upon due weighting and appreciation but the Board could not just ignore them in their decision. The Court considered that the Umpire should have intervened on this point to order a new hearing.
