| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
courses |
pattern study-work simultaneously |
|
Summary:
There is a presumption that a full time student is not available for work. The presumption can be rebutted by evidence of a record of working while studying or by establishing availibility outside class hours. In a written submission to the umpire, the claimant informed the Umpire of her employment in three part-time jobs while attending school. The Umpire ruled that the issue of availability is a question of fact and that the BOR made no reviewable error. The FCA is not persuaded that the Umpire made any error that warrants its intervention.
