| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| labour dispute |
stoppage of work |
business discontinued |
|
Summary:
If dispute had not been settled it would have been logical to consider the date of permanent closing (2 months later) as starting point for disentitlement. Any other conclusion would be perverse. Appeal to CF dismissed without comment.
According to board, purely economic reasons and final termination during stoppage. Erroneous finding of fact. Dispute terminated when agreement ratified, not when employer stated intention to close store 2 months earlier. Upheld in FC without comment.
