Decision A-1284.92
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision A-1284.92 | Simard Adhémard | Federal | French | 1994-03-04 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed Unanimous | No | N/A | 21472 |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| penalties | reconsideration of penalty | reduction |
Summary:
It appears clear to us, for the reasons given in SMITH S., that the Umpire exceeded his jurisdiction by reducing the penalties that the Commission had imposed upon the claimant. The Umpire could not substitute his discretion to that of the Commission who had imposed a penalty under ss. 33(1).