| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| basic concepts |
insurability |
jurisdiction |
|
Summary:
Evidence highly conflicting as to whether claimant worked. The Board found that he did. Commission's submission that the Board had no jurisdiction to decide that employment was insurable found irrelevant by Umpire, the issue simply being whether he worked. The Umpire did not err.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| umpires |
grounds of appeal |
capricious finding |
req'd |
Summary:
Evidence highly conflicting as to whether claimant worked. The Board found that he did, so he qualified for benefits. The Umpire refused to intervene. Question of fact and credibility. The Umpire did not err in not interfering with the Board's decision.
