Decision A-1124.92

Case Number Claimant Judge Language Decision date
Decision A-1124.92 Archambault Stéphane  Federal  French 1993-11-04
Decision Appealed Appellant Corresponding Case
Allowed Unanimous  No N/A  21318 


Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
basic concepts  rate of benefit  disqualification 

Summary:

Section 30(7) and the reference to it in s. 30(6) are only meaningful if the Commission is vested with the additional power to determine how long the rate reduction will apply. [Then, not automatically to the balance of the benefit period].


Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
board of referees  rules of construction  intent and object 

Summary:

It is possible that the Parliament worded the new penalty loosely and that it should say exactly what EIC suggested it ought to say. Even if that were so, I have no choice, pursuant to ABRAHAMS to opt as between two imperfect interpretations for the one which favours the claimant.


Date modified: