| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| voluntarily leaving employment |
working conditions |
hours |
|
Summary:
The decision of the BOR, upheld by the Umpire, found that that claimant had voluntarily left his employment, but at the same time, recognized that this departure was the result of a misunderstanding. The FCA decided that neither the BOR nor the Umpire asked whether the claimant had actually left his employment and, if so, whether the termination of employment was voluntary. Case returned to the BOR for re-determination.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| voluntarily leaving employment |
just cause |
significant change in duties |
|
Summary:
The decision of the BOR, upheld by the Umpire, found that that claimant had voluntarily left his employment, but at the same time, recognized that this departure was the result of a misunderstanding. The FCA decided that neither the BOR nor the Umpire asked whether the claimant had actually left his employment and, if so, whether the termination of employment was voluntary. Case returned to the BOR for re-determination.
