Decision A-0788.88
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision A-0788.88 | Lamontagne Rachel | Federal | French | 1989-05-03 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed Unanimous | No | N/A | 15410 |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| basic concepts | insurability | notice pay |
Summary:
The practical application of ss. 36(6) leads me to conclude that the amount paid by way of notice without the employee in fact having worked should be regarded as increasing the insurable earnings but not as an additional insured week. Upheld by FC without comment.