| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| claim procedure |
filing an application |
time prescribed |
|
Summary:
Disentitlement from 5-8 rescinded 12-9. Report cards effective 12-8 returned 23-9. Claimant then disentitled from 12-8 to 22-9. One may wonder what basis there was for disentitlement from 12-9 to 22-9. It is clear that the 3-week delay was not elapsed when report card received.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| claim procedure |
applicability |
during disqualification |
|
Summary:
I agree with the Umpire that the legislation does not require that a claim for benefit be made for a week for which an applicant has been disqualified or disentitled.
Whether it is required to file weekly claims for weeks where benefit is otherwise payable. Not a requirement that can be found in or read into ss. 30(1), 40(1) or s. 41. It will thus be necessary for claimant to satisfy the Commission at some point that he was eligible.
