| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| basic concepts |
rate of benefit |
computation |
|
Summary:
Claimant had received 67 weeks of benefits since 30-06-1996. In October 2000, claimant was told that his benefit rate would be set at 52% of his weekly insurable earnings under sections 14 and 15 of the EIA. Umpire dismissed the claimant's appeal but the Court, on the Commission's recommendation, allowed the application for judicial review and ordered, without providing reasons, that the benefit rate be calculated under section 14 only. Judgment with no jurisprudential value.
