| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
special reasons |
appealable |
time for appeal to bor |
Summary:
In his appeal claimant raised the s. 36 disentitlement. The CEIC advised him it was too late. He applied for an extension of time. It was refused by letter 27-8. Was the matter subject of appeal to the Board, the Umpire and this Court? It was not. The letter of 27-8 was.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| basic concepts |
benefit periods |
extension |
workers' compensation |
Summary:
Not only does 9(7)(c) not treat equally situated persons unequally, it actually affords disabled persons who have received workers' compensation payments the same benefits under the Act that other disabled are entitled to, all else being equal. It does not offend the Charter.
