| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
restrictions |
hours of work |
|
Summary:
Eleven times, claimant refused to do split shifts as provided for in her collective agreement. Claimant deemed not available for those days. Decision reversed by BOR but again reversed by Umpire, who ruled that a collective agreement could not take precedence over the Act. In a brief decision, FCA set aside Umpire's decision, stating that Umpire had substituted own interpretation of the facts for that of BOR.
