| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| penalties |
proof |
need for an explanation |
|
Summary:
The Commission has the onus of proving that a false statement was made. Claimant admits it in this case, and therefore it is his responsibility to provide a reasonable explanation. The reasonableness of the explanation is a question of fact to be determined by the Board. Upheld by the FC.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| penalties |
proof |
need for an explanation |
weight |
Summary:
The Commission has the onus of proving that a false statement was made. Claimant admits it in this case, and therefore it is his responsibility to provide a reasonable explanation. The reasonableness of the explanation is a question of fact to be determined by the Board. Upheld by the FC.
