Decision A-0534.01

Case Number Claimant Judge Language Decision date
Decision A-0534.01 Limosi Stéphane  Federal  French 2003-05-08
Decision Appealed Appellant Corresponding Case
Allowed Unanimous - Returned to the ump  No Commission 


Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
basic concepts  number of hours required  violation 

Summary:

A benefit period could not be established because the claimant had accumulated less than the 840 hours of insurable employment required due to the accumulation of several violations. The Court explains that a claimant automatically accumulates a violation when a penalty is imposed following one of the acts mentioned in subsection 7.1(4) of the Act. The Court states there is nothing in the Act to indicate the obligation for the notice of violation to be sent by registered mail, the notice of violation as such is simply the means used by the Commission to inform the claimant of the decision rendered and to permit the claimant to contest that decision.


Date modified: