| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| voluntarily leaving employment |
just cause |
contrary to law |
|
Summary:
Claimant quit his job because he was dissatisfied with his employment. According to claimant, he had a deal with his employer to put "laid-off" rather than "terminated" on the ROE but bookkeeper was honest and put "terminated". Claimant argues that the employer should have misrepresented the cause for the cessation of his employment. The BOR, the Umpire nor the FCA would consider such an argument. The FCA simply confirmed that there was sufficient evidence on file to support the BOR's decision that there were no just cause.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| voluntarily leaving employment |
working conditions |
unsatisfactory |
|
Summary:
Claimant quit his job because he was dissatisfied with his employment. According to claimant, he had a deal with his employer to put "laid-off" rather than "terminated" on the ROE but bookkeeper was honest and put "terminated". Claimant argues that the employer should have misrepresented the cause for the cessation of his employment. The BOR, the Umpire nor the FCA would consider such an argument. The FCA simply confirmed that there was sufficient evidence on file to support the BOR's decision that there were no just cause.
