| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| basic concepts |
insurability |
jurisdiction |
|
Summary:
Making reference to FCA decision in Hoek (A-0089.99), the Court held that an insurability issue had to be determined by the Department of National Revenue (now the Canadian Customs and Revenue Agency). Neither the BOR or the Umpire had the jurisdiction to determine the number of hours in insurable employment.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| basic concepts |
insurability |
appeals |
|
Summary:
Making reference to FCA decision in Hoek (A-0089.99), the Court held that an insurability issue had to be determined by the Department of National Revenue (now the Canadian Customs and Revenue Agency). Neither the BOR or the Umpire had the jurisdiction to determine the number of hours in insurable employment.
