| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
hearings |
tape-recording |
|
Summary:
Claimant argued that a recording is a transcript within the meaning of the Regulations, and that a reproduction of the exchanges at the hearing of the case by the BOR should be in the appeal file. The Umpire ruled that the two terms did not mean the same thing, and that if there had been no recording at the time of the hearing, there consequently could not be any transcript of the testimonies. Application for judicial review summarily dismissed by the FCA.
