Decision A-0456.02
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision A-0456.02 | Stephens Russell | Federal | English | 2003-12-16 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Allowed Unanimous - Returned to the ump | No | Claimant | 54171 |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| teaching | casual or substitute | applicability |
Summary:
The Court stated that it is theoretically possible that a teacher may have a period of employment as a supply teacher that is sufficiently regular that it cannot be said to be "employment on a casual or substitute basis". However, the mere existence of a term teaching contract covering a particular period does not necessarily deprive a person of the benefit of paragraph 33(2)(b) for that period.