| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
rules of construction |
each word counts |
|
Summary:
As per a reliable source of authority, it is a serious error to read into an Act of Parliament words which are not there and it is something to avoid. Respondent asks the Court to distinguish where the legislator did not and this is an error of interpretation.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
overpayment |
deduction from benefits |
|
Summary:
The retentions made from UI benefits in the case of a bankrupt claimant contravened the Bankruptcy Act. The Commission acted unlawfully. The recovery of the overpayment must be withheld.
