Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
misconduct |
definition |
|
|
Summary:
Claimant was dismissed on the ground of breaching the hospital's confidentiality policy she accessed a patient's file not in her care. FCA set aside Umpire's decision because he did not determine whether the conduct was wilful or reckless to the point of being wilful. Matter referred back to the Chief Umpire for redetermination on the basis that the claimant did not lose her job by reason of her own misconduct.
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
misconduct |
breach of rules |
|
|
Summary:
Claimant was dismissed on the ground of breaching the hospital's confidentiality policy she accessed a patient's file not in her care. FCA set aside Umpire's decision because he did not determine whether the conduct was wilful or reckless to the point of being wilful. Matter referred back to the Chief Umpire for redetermination on the basis that the claimant did not lose her job by reason of her own misconduct.