| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| week of unemployment |
business of a relative |
|
|
Summary:
Claimant financed a convenience store for his son and worked there full-time without salary while collecting benefits, and with salary thereafter. No job search. Appeal dismissed by Umpire, and subsequently by the FC without reasons.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| week of unemployment |
rationale |
|
|
Summary:
The purpose of the Act is not to subsidize small businesses, but rather to help those who have lost their employment and who, after many attempts, cannot find another one, said the Umpire. Judgment upheld by the FC without reasons.
