Decision A-0372.96

Case Number Claimant Judge Language Decision date
Decision A-0372.96 Georges Daniel  Federal  French 1996-10-30
Decision Appealed Appellant Corresponding Case
Dismissed Majority  No Claimant 


Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
courses of instruction or training  referral  discrimination 

Summary:

FCA found that the Commission’s decision as to whether or not to refer a claimant to a course covered by ss. 26(1) of the Act cannot be appealed under ss. 26(8). Consequently, neither the BOR, the Umpire, nor this Court has the jurisdiction to hear a challenge of the Commission’s decision on the grounds that the claimant was a victim of discrimination within the meaning of s. 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. He should have applied to another forum.


Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
courses of instruction or training  referral  appeal 

Summary:

FCA found that the Commission’s decision as to whether or not to refer a claimant to a course covered by ss. 26(1) of the Act cannot be appealed under ss. 26(8). Consequently, neither the BOR, the Umpire, nor this Court has the jurisdiction to hear a challenge of the Commission’s decision on the grounds that the claimant was a victim of discrimination within the meaning of s. 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. He should have applied to another forum.


Date modified: