Decision A-0370.99
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision A-0370.99 | Vilaca David | Federal | English | 2001-01-30 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Allowed Unanimous - Returned to the ump | No | Commission | 44674 |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| claim procedure | notice of interview |
Summary:
Making reference to its decision in Herrera (A-0397.99), the Court was of the view that the Umpire erred in law when he found that the information session was not an "interview" within the legislation. The information session referred to in the notice to report falls squarely within the definition of interview enunciated by Parliament in paragraph 27(1)(i) of the EIA.