| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| week of unemployment |
minor in extent |
|
|
Summary:
Claimant worked 10 hours/week as a real estate agent while receiving benefits. He was found not to be unemployed and this decision was upheld by the BOR and the Umpire. According to the FCA, BOR erred in accepting the claimant's testimony that he did only 10 hours of unpaid work and deciding that he could count on this work as a principal means of livelihood. Requirements of subsection 43(2) met and claimant's appeal allowed.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| week of unemployment |
principal means of livelihood |
|
|
Summary:
Claimant worked 10 hours/week as a real estate agent while receiving benefits. He was found not to be unemployed and this decision was upheld by the BOR and the Umpire. According to the FCA, BOR erred in accepting the claimant's testimony that he did only 10 hours of unpaid work and deciding that he could count on this work as a principal means of livelihood. Requirements of subsection 43(2) met and claimant's appeal allowed.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| week of unemployment |
real estate salespersons |
|
|
Summary:
Claimant worked 10 hours/week as a real estate agent while receiving benefits. He was found not to be unemployed and this decision was upheld by the BOR and the Umpire. According to the FCA, BOR erred in accepting the claimant's testimony that he did only 10 hours of unpaid work and deciding that he could count on this work as a principal means of livelihood. Requirements of subsection 43(2) met and claimant's appeal allowed.
