Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
voluntarily leaving employment |
applicability |
|
|
Summary:
As a result of an investigation the Commission disqualified the claimant from benefits because he quit his job without just cause. Also a penalty was imposed because based on the evidence the ROE was false. BOR find the claimant's statements inconsistent that in fact, he was not laid off due to shortage but rather he quit and the ROE was incorrect. Umpire was unable to find that the BOR made any reviewable error in its decison. Decision's maintained by the Court.
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
penalties |
misrepresentation |
|
|
Summary:
As a result of an investigation the Commission disqualified the cliamant from benefits because he quit his job without just cause. Also a penalty was imposed for a ROE. BOR find the claimant's statements inconsistent that in fact, he was not laid off due to shortage but rather he quit and the ROE was incorrect. Umpire was unable to find that the BOR made any reviewable error in its decison. Decision's maintained by the Court.