| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
errors in law |
issue not recognized |
|
Summary:
The FCA found that the BOR had asked itself the wrong question, that is, whether the claimant voluntarily left his employment rather than whether there was misconduct established. Pointing at some of the inconsistent and inaccurate findings of the BOR, the FCA ordered that the case be sent back to a new BOR for rehearing.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
errors in law |
statement of facts required |
|
Summary:
Pointing at some of the inconsistent and inaccurate findings of the BOR, the FCA ordered that the case be sent back to a new BOR for rehearing. The FCA reiterated the necessity for the BOR to address the issues actually presented to them carefully and to explain their findings in coherent and consistent reasoning. Anything less is unacceptable.
