| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| voluntarily leaving employment |
legislation |
burden of proof |
|
Summary:
After hearing the facts, BOR found that the claimant had just cause to quit his job because he had no alternative and also recognized that the employment tried out for a very short period (three days) proved unsuitable. Umpire reversed this decision. FCA found that the BOR had made findings of fact from the evidence before it. Without a transcript of this evidence, the Umpire could not know the evidence on which the BOR had based its decision, much less find it insufficient to justify the claimant's decision to quit.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| voluntarily leaving employment |
proof |
charter |
|
Summary:
After hearing the facts, BOR found that the claimant had just cause to quit his job because he had no alternative and also recognized that the employment tried out for a very short period (three days) proved unsuitable. Umpire reversed this decision. FCA found that the BOR had made findings of fact from the evidence before it. Without a transcript of this evidence, the Umpire could not know the evidence on which the BOR had based its decision, much less find it insufficient to justify the claimant's decision to quit.
