| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| teaching |
contract renewed |
|
|
Summary:
On 26 February 2004, the claimant signed a part-time teaching contract that ended on 23 June 2004. On 30 June 2004, she signed a new full-time teaching contract for the 2004-2005 school year. Citing the Stone (A-367-04), Bishop (A-151-01), Partridge (A-704-97), and Oliver et al (A-811-01) decisions, the Court ruled that a review of teachers's terms of employment could not rely only on contract start and end dates to determine whether a contract had ended under the terms of Regulation 33(2)a). Since the claimant had signed a full-time teaching contract on 30 June 2004 for the 2004-2005 school year, the Court ruled that the continuity of employment was not severed during the 2004 summer period.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| teaching |
contract terminating with end of school year |
|
|
Summary:
On 26 February 2004, the claimant signed a part-time teaching contract that ended on 23 June 2004. On 30 June 2004, she signed a new full-time teaching contract for the 2004-2005 school year. Citing the Stone (A-367-04), Bishop (A-151-01), Partridge (A-704-97), and Oliver et al (A-811-01) decisions, the Court ruled that a review of teachers's terms of employment could not rely only on contract start and end dates to determine whether a contract had ended under the terms of Regulation 33(2)a). Since the claimant had signed a full-time teaching contract on 30 June 2004 for the 2004-2005 school year, the Court ruled that the continuity of employment was not severed during the 2004 summer period.
