| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| basic concepts |
rate of unemployment |
|
|
Summary:
The evidence is to the effect that the method of averaging rates of unemployment and the calculation carried to one decimal point was in keeping with standard practice and has been consistently applied in the past [p.7] as per Umpire. S.28 application dismissed for same reason.
The challenge raised is as to the means by which Statistics Canada arrived at the figures. Challenge not opened to clts since reg. 166(2) precluded the critical analysis of the figures and Comm. must apply them [p.7]. as per Umpire. S.28 application dismissed for same reason.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| umpires |
grounds of appeal |
capricious finding |
meaning |
Summary:
It is the finding of fact of the Board that is put into question. Such an attack is not admissible if based on mere suppositions, conjectures or possibilities and not on any clear evidence [p.7] as per Umpire. S.28 application dismissed for the reasons given by the Umpire.
