| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
right to cross-examine |
|
|
Summary:
According to Umpire, evidence in record that was obtained by telephone is inadmissible, as those persons coudl nto be questioned either by the board or by the judge. Judgment reversed. Judge must consider all the evidence before him, including evidence filed under Reg. 68.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
weight of statements |
by telephone |
|
Summary:
According to Umpire, evidence in record that was obtained by telephone is inadmissible, as those persons coudl nto be questioned either by the board or by the judge. Judgment reversed. Judge must consider all the evidence before him, including evidence filed under Reg. 68.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
hearings |
attendance of third party |
|
Summary:
Applicants, here the CEIC, have burden of showing that board erred and, in order to discharge this burden, may require that witnesses attend if they consider it necessary.
