| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| earnings |
income |
sale of union jurisdiction |
|
Summary:
In addition to severance pay, claimant received $70,000 as a result of the sale of a union jurisdiction. The Umpire held that this payment arose not from claimant's employment but from management's decision to implement an automated composing room. The Umpire made an error. HARNETT applies.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| earnings |
income |
arising out of any employment |
|
Summary:
HARNETT covers this situation in that the amount received by claimant (for the sale of a union jurisdiction thereby enabling the employer to implement an automated composing room) cannot be said to be "totally unrelated to advantages arising from employment".
