Decision A-0190.95
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision A-0190.95 | Kuldip Sekhon | Federal | English | 1995-12-04 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed Unanimous | No | N/A | 27031 |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| umpires | grounds of appeal | natural justice and error in law or in fact |
Summary:
The findings of the BOR are on credibility. They had the unique opportunity of hearing and assessing the credibility of the appellant. Unless the Board erred under S.80 of the Act, an Umpire should not intervene in the appeal process. The FCA did not disturb the Umpire's decision.