| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| claim procedure |
proof required for entitlement |
|
|
Summary:
A portion of the settlement represents damages for breach of contrat, another represents compensation for the loss of the right to future earnings. The latter is earnings as per WALFORD. No evidence to quantify the 2 portions. Proof to be made by claimant under ss.40(1).
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| earnings |
awards |
as income |
|
Summary:
A portion of the settlement represents damages for breach of contrat, another represents compensation for the loss of the right to future earnings. The latter is earnings as per WALFORD. No evidence to quantify the 2 portions. Proof to be made by claimant under ss.54(1).
The by-law of the Town affords the most cogent evidence presently on the record of the agreement between the Town and claimant as to the nature of the settlement between the parties in respect of the termination of claimant's employment.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| umpires |
jurisdiction |
request for review |
new facts to BOR, Umpire or Commission |
Summary:
Part of the settlement is for damages for breach of contract, another for compensation for loss of right to future earnings. The latter is earnings but no evidence to quantify the 2 portions. Since the Umpire is empowered under s.86 to hear new evidence, case returned for rehearing.
