| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| penalties |
work without remuneration |
|
|
Summary:
Not drawing any income from his business, claimant under the belief that he did not have to declare on his report cards that he was working. Without any specific findings of facts, the BOR dismissed the claimant's appeal and the Umpire refused to interfere. Decisions such as that of the BOR are not to be read "microscopically" ruled the FCA. While it is true that the BOR did not explicitly condemn the applicant's evidence as not worthy of belief, its refusal to accept his explanations is more than apparent from the unanimous finding of the BOR.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| penalties |
knowingly |
|
|
Summary:
Not drawing any income from his business, claimant under the belief that he did not have to declare on his report cards that he was working. Without any specific findings of facts, the BOR dismissed the claimant's appeal and the Umpire refused to interfere. Decisions such as that of the BOR are not to be read "microscopically" ruled the FCA. While it is true that the BOR did not explicitly condemn the applicant's evidence as not worthy of belief, its refusal to accept his explanations is more than apparent from the unanimous finding of the BOR.
