| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| basic concepts |
insurability |
appeals |
|
Summary:
FCA held that matters concerning hours of insurable employment were matters of insurability for the Canadian Customs and Revenue Agency to decide and not for the BOR and Umpire who were limited to issues of entitlement. References made to FCA decisions in Hawryluk (A-0466.98) and Haberman (A-0717.98).
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| basic concepts |
insurability |
jurisdiction |
|
Summary:
FCA held that matters concerning hours of insurable employment were matters of insurability for the Canadian Customs and Revenue Agency to decide and not for the BOR and Umpire who were limited to issues of entitlement. References made to FCA decisions in Hawryluk (A-0466.98) and Haberman (A-0717.98).
