| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| teaching |
sickness benefits |
christmas holidays |
|
Summary:
Claimant on sick leave from 12-92 to 03-93 and Christmas vacation at issue. Umpire erred in stating that respondent could not be deemed to be bound by a teaching contract. The evidence showed that the contract had never been terminated. Services and pay simply suspended. Section 46.1 was therefore applicable.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| teaching |
non-teaching period |
defined |
|
Summary:
In the Court's view, the expression "non-teaching period" includes summer vacation, Christmas holidays and any other off period. The insured person was therefore ineligible for benefits between 21-12-92 and 01-01-93 because that period was a non-teaching period within the meaning of section 46.1(2) of the Regulations.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| teaching |
teaching |
charter |
|
Summary:
The purpose of section 46.1 of the Regulations is to prevent teachers who receive wages spread over a period of twelve months but who do not provide services every day, from receiving money from two different sources that have the same objective.
