| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| umpires |
jurisdiction |
damages in tort |
|
Summary:
Penalty imposed because claimant had not reported all of his earnings. The penalty was subsequently rescinded but claimant stated that he had been wrongfully accused of fraud resulting in a damage to his reputation. Umpire dismissed the claimant's allegation as the penalty had been removed. Claimant appealed at the FCA as he was seeking damages for defamation. Application summarily dismissed: the Court is without jurisdiction to do what the claimant requests.
