| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
special reasons |
change in jurisprudence |
|
Summary:
The Board held that a jurisprudential change constituted special reasons to extend the appeal period. The Board was not allowed to substitute its discretion for that of the Commission. The Umpire was correct in intervening.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
special reasons |
appealable |
time for appeal to bor |
Summary:
The Board could not intervene unless it believed that the Commission had not exercised its discretion judicially, had considered irrelevant matters or had failed to consider relevant matters.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
special reasons |
discretion of Commission |
time for appeal to bor |
Summary:
The Board held that a jurisprudential change constituted special reasons to extend the appeal period. The Board was not allowed to substitute its discretion for that of the Commission. The Umpire was correct in intervening.
