Decision A-0003.95
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision A-0003.95 | Eppel Ralph | Federal | English | 1995-09-28 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Allowed Unanimous | No | N/A |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| voluntarily leaving employment | applicability | voluntary leaving defined |
Summary:
Claimant did not quit but was dismissed. In reviewing a ruling of disqualification based on S.28 of the Act, there is no automatic duty, in all cases, to inquire into the possibility that either of the two causes therein referred to could apply. From evidence at bar, no misconduct proven.