| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
breaches of company policy |
|
|
Summary:
The Commission denied the claimant benefits because it was of the opinion that he had lost his job as a result of misconduct within the meaning of sections 29 and 30 of the EI Act. The claimant, a mortgage manager for a bank, was dismissed because the Bank after an investigation concluded that the claimant had acted contrary to the Bank’s conduct policy by lending his own funds to a customer. The Bank considered that the claimant had placed himself in a conflict of interest situation. The appeal by the claimant was dismissed by the Umpire.
